Blog

  • Local Search’s Unseen Trap: App Location Technology

    local search trageting
    local search trageting

    Your local search program is buttoned up. You’ve got your location information just they way it should be. It’s clean and accurate with the phone numbers, streets, directionals, numbers and your schema code is all correct. You even have your location meta data all set.

    You’ve personally reviewed the information in all your accounts with the big search engines, local sites, and it looks good. There is nothing on your web site that doesn’t match what you’ve distributed to the aggregators or mapping sites. Search engine crawling shouldn’t be an issue.

    All’s good. Your customers can find you and you can go on to your next project. Or can you?

    You think you’ve hit the target. But, it’s not a target you needed to shoot for. Its another moving object…. the consumer.

    Local search marketing is more analogous to trying to make two arrows hit in mid-flight than it is to hitting a stationary target.

    Local search reality

    Between your nice clean data and the consumer is the messy, dirty world of apps, mapping algorithms and sensors. They follow the consumer around and when the consumer tries to find you, these applications start trying to pin down the location of the consumer. And thats where the fun begins.

    You’ll hear the services talk about how precise they are. They can locate people down to the city, neighborhood or block. But they are not locating the person. What they are doing is taking in the data from the sensors (GPS, IP, WiFi, cell towers, registrations etc), running that through their own programs, and then calculating where they think the consumer is.

    The data may allow them to calculate a precise location. But, if the data is bad, it is precisely the wrong location. This, combined with the uncertainty of the technology being used creates an exponential problem of inaccuracy.

    This is the focus of a study by local technology company ThinkNear’s: Local Score Index. According the the study, as the proliferation of apps with location based functionality grows, the accuracy of the overall location ecosystem decreases. For advertisers, this become problematic when going through an exchange or blind network.

    We may see CTRs drop as a result of users seeing ads for our businesses when the store is not actually close the the user. The apps in which the ads run become a problem which we need to mitigate through more time and effort in manual optimization.

    Perhaps worse, the user clicks the ad, sees how far of the location really is and then bounces. The feeling the consumer has from the bad experience is not limited to the app. They associate your company to the feeling as well. It is more than a wasted click, it is erecting a barrier between you and the consumer. If it happens often enough, the barrier will be too high for the consumer to see you; they’ll ignore your ads in the future.

    What to do
    The deal
    Stick to proven ad serving technology or negotiate performance (conversion) based deals with newer companies. Ultimately, we’d like everything to be conversion based, but that is easier said than done. However, if you are going to take a risk on a new network, then the deal has to protect you from the likelihood that the technology is still being tweaked.

    The ad
    While we like high CTRs, not all clicks are created equal. If proximity is truly key to the success of your campaign, then your ads need to reflect that. Let the user know where you are before they click. You may end up with a low CTR and ultimately, low impressions as the networks optimize you out of delivery. But, that is better than paying for clicks that don’t convert.

    The analytics
    Track EVERYTHING. Your ad tags should be to the most minute degree possible. If dynamic tagging is available, leverage it. The key to optimizing is nuance. The more granular the data, the better optimization you can achieve. Within a vast amount of bad impressions and clicks are some nuggets of gold. Without the right tracking, you’ll throw those out with the rest of the network.

    Normally I tell clients that online marketing is not rocket science, its just hard work. But local search introduces a level of technology that can seem incomprehensibly complex. To manage campaigns around this, stick to the basics. It sounds odd, but the key to managing highly complex delivery technology is to stick to the mundane foundation of basic optimization. Track it and even the most complex programs can be managed and optimized.

  • Omni-channel brands start with culture

    So, you want to be an Omni-channel brand?

    Omni-channel is described as a seamless experience for the consumer regardless of their mode of interaction. In other words they and your employees have the same product, options, pricing, delivery and service options no matter where they are in your brand / purchasing ecosystem. All customer history and preferences are available online, to your operators (phone & chat) and in your brick & mortar locations. At no point does the customer have to “re-educate” your employees on their history with you, and at no point do your employees have to explain why “we’re different” in the store than online. No matter where customers and employees are, access to information and capabilities is the same.

    There are some omni-channel proponents that suggest this concept extends beyond, and even breaks down the barriers between, brands. While a bit Utopian and the comparison to social media adoption is a bit of a stretch for me, I like the concept.

    In any case, how do companies start down the omni-channel path? Broadly, there are two areas companies have to tackle. One, cultural / organizational and the other technical. Before tackling the latter, companies need to address the former.

    An Omni-channel Culture

    There are several cultural impediments to an omni-channel experience and any one of these can trip up the effort to roll it out.

    Us vs them.

    I’m not talking about your company vs the consumer (if thats an issue, you’ve got bigger problems). I am addressing departments vs departments or silos within the company. Some of these tensions are organizationally driven. Major retailers still segment their online store from the off-line stores with separate inventory for in-store vs online (which I understand, but…), and the two cannot leverage the whole; customer are turned away because they don’t have access to inventory within the company. I’ve also seen online departments that only get credit for sales through the online channel and don’t derive benefit or credit from sales to the in store channel on which they assist. Assets and benefits need to transcend groups or departments so that internal barriers do not interfere with the customer experience.

    Beyond the sales channels, there is often tension between sales and support services or accounting / billing. This tension is often a derivative of no unifying mission and results in the “its not my job” mentality, often supported by intentional technical barriers between departments. How often have our calls been transferred from sales to billing and we have to re-introduce ourselves and our issues? When this happens, I am told that “they are on a different system.” While this is a technical issue on the surface, companies need to ensure it is not the result of a policy that requires the barrier to exist.

    Margins rule

    There was a time in sales when every salesperson was directed to “get the most” out of every sale – milk it for the margin. When companies look at pricing strategies, the same perspective seems to apply. The online pricing and the in-store pricing is different. Sale prices online are not available in the store. This stems from either a disconnect between the two, or an attempt to squeeze margin from one place at the cost of a cohesive customer experience.

    There are legitimate reasons for different pricing strategies online vs in store, geographically or even time of day. As companies consider these strategies, they must consider them within the greater vision of an omni-channel experience for their customers. If the pricing strategy does not support the vision, then it should be forsaken, even at the cost of short term benefits.

    Companies need to take the long view of the customer relationship and standardize pricing in order to be ready for the omni-channel experience. Temptations to implement short term ‘fixes’ need to be avoided. For line managers, pricing adjustments (up or down) are an “easy’ tactic. Senior management must establish the culture that dissuades this behavior. Its not easy, but an omni-channel experience requires it.

    Short term value

    When we implement a new program we are often impatient about seeing results. This can have a devastating affect on omni-channel initiatives. We have two instincts to mitigate.

    First, the impact of omni-channel is not immediate. Consumers might not be aware of it right away as they tend to only notice when things go wrong. They won’t notice a lack of conflict between online and offline, or the seamless transfer of contact from one department to another. They’ll simply accept it.

    What is key is that we’ll see the attrition of customers decrease over time as we mitigate their frustrations. If we are fortunate and our competition has not successfully adopted an omni-channel approach, we can even capture some of their customers. When we implement omni-channel we must guard against our desire to see an immediate and big change.

    Second, our employees who may have been focused on ‘closing the sale now’ must accept that this is a brand’s customer and the relationship transcends the transaction. It is okay if the customer needs to take a step back or do more research. It is okay if they shop in store and buy online later or the reverse. The shopping experience is not limited to the store or the website; it covers a longer period and will likely include both. With patience we may create more sales over time while nurturing the customers wherever we are in contact..

    Starting with culture

    Like so many things, the technical challenges, though not trivial, are not the challenges we need to tackle first. Our companies, our cultures need to be ready first. No matter the technology, it is about people. Give your employees the right tools, in the right culture and you will have customers for the long haul being nurtured across all interactions.

  • Google Adwords Spring Cleaning

    Getting ready for spring, Google will help clear out some of the account junk you’ve accumulated over the year. Starting March 23, unused ads over 100 days old will go away. This is a good move, but if you are not aware, then you’ll be surprised by what you don’t see in the last week of March. But of course, now you are aware. So, no surprises.

    More here 

  • Drive conversion with trust through reviews

    TrustPilot_Logo_220_jpg_200x40_q95Building trust through reviews is a growing imperative for online and offline businesses. How to do this can be a mystery to some who can learn from others who have traveled this path. Trustpilot and Internet Retailer will conduct a webinar on March 19th at 2pm. EST.

  • Google AdWords Drops Four Data Points

    googlelogo225I’ve often cautioned clients about “over consuming” data. I’m a data geek, but I know that data you can not use often clouds the data you can.

    The news that Google Adwords is reducing the number of columns (Google, the data Geek of the world) because advertisers are confused by too much adwords data shows that even the biggest fans of data recognized the limitations of unlimited data.